Make evaluation consistent
Publish one canonical representation of plans, capabilities, regions, and limitations while preserving links back to the owning source.
← Platform
For software and platform teams
Make software easier for agents to evaluate.
Lumeo turns maintained product and assurance sources into a coherent evaluation interface, so agents can retrieve evidence without flattening nuanced plans, limits, or security statements.
Why teams make the change
A better interface creates better decisions before it creates automation.
Answer trust questions with evidence
Expose approved security and privacy material as cited resources without claiming controls or certifications the company cannot substantiate.
Improve qualified handoffs
Allow an agent to prepare a well-scoped trial, security review, or solution request instead of sending an unstructured contact form.
Representative journeys
What a useful agent interaction looks like.
The request remains natural. The response and control boundary become explicit.
“Compare the plans for a 60-person engineering organization.”
Plan constraints, included capabilities, usage model, and source-linked commercial notes.
Public product read“Does this service support EU data residency and SAML?”
Current, cited answers from approved documentation, including limitations or an unknown state.
Scoped assurance read“Prepare a security review for our procurement team.”
A structured request with company context, requested evidence, and an accountable recipient.
Approval before external handoffSource authority map
Every answer should have an accountable owner.
Lumeo does not treat every page as equally authoritative. Each fact type can point to the system responsible for keeping it true.
SystemOwnsPublished as
Plans, features, limits, deployment options
Canonical capability model
APIs, integrations, setup, supported behavior
Searchable resources
Security, privacy, architecture, current assurance
Cited evidence endpoints
Qualified handoff and review status
Approval-gated tools
Tool patterns
Start narrow. Earn the right to automate.
compare_plansReadPlan comparison
Returns relevant limits and capabilities without inventing a recommendation score.
find_documentationReadDocumentation search
Retrieves maintained product and integration evidence with provenance.
prepare_security_reviewApprovalSecurity review
Builds a complete, reviewable vendor request before it enters the customer workflow.
Where the current experience breaks
Plan limits, feature availability, and commercial terms drift across pricing pages, help centers, and sales material.
Security answers are often trapped in PDFs or portals with no stable machine-readable reference.
Procurement agents can summarize marketing language but cannot distinguish verified facts from positioning copy.
What a controlled gateway changes
Canonical plan, capability, integration, and policy records linked to their maintained sources.
A bounded documentation and security-evidence interface for research and procurement workflows.
Approval-gated handoffs for trials, questionnaires, solution reviews, and commercial requests.
A responsible rollout
Move from readable to operational in controlled steps.
Normalize product information
Connect maintained pricing and documentation sources, then resolve plan and terminology conflicts.
Add assurance evidence
Publish only reviewed security, privacy, residency, and compliance statements with clear owners and dates.
Create accountable handoffs
Integrate trials, questionnaires, or solution reviews with narrow schemas and responsible recipients.
Questions worth asking
Clarity before commitment.
Is this another documentation search bot?
No. Retrieval is one capability. Lumeo also controls source authority, domain ownership, access scopes, tool execution, usage, and response integrity.
Can private security documents remain private?
Yes. Public context and scoped evidence can use different access policies. Sensitive materials should only be exposed to approved clients and according to the customer agreement.
Will Lumeo answer questions when evidence is missing?
The intended behavior is to return an unknown or unsupported state rather than manufacture a product or assurance claim.
Begin with one source and one useful question